Litigation tech strategy, pipelines and audits for litigation and disputes teams. We agree with counsel what AI should touch, build it around the record, verify the output against the sources, and publish what we checked.
An appeal or dispute already running, built around under its deadline: document map, chronology with provenance, citation matrix, adversarial read of the draft. Forensic report where the facts need reconstructing: money flows, timelines, document trails, every finding anchored to an exhibit. Audit report of what the AI did and what was checked.
Independent check of an AI-assisted filing or workflow: every citation to the page, every quotation to its source, a record of what was checked and what was not. Before filing, or after a show-cause order.
The same pipeline, built for one workflow you already do by hand. Four to six weeks, measured against a baseline. You keep the pipeline and the dossier.
The written AI policy and verification protocol regulators and insurers now ask for, mapped to the rules that apply to your firm. Training for the people who sign.
For lawyers and legal teams, instructed by counsel of record. Which models see the material, and where it is stored, is agreed in writing; every step is logged; the lawyer decides and signs. Satrix.ai is a technical practice, not a law firm, and gives no legal advice.
Post-deal and shareholder disputes, asset recovery and fraud, claims against professional advisers, regulatory and disciplinary proceedings, in English and Portuguese.
Three trades before litigating as a party: designing high-reliability systems, strategy consulting, and the deal side of M&A. Each shows up in the work: systems that keep state and log every step, options costed before counsel commits, and knowing where the evidence lives before disclosure arrives (the data room, the engagement letters, the board minutes).
When a matter needs more than we are, we bring the specialist in, briefed from the case file: expert witnesses, forensic accountants, investigators, foreign-law experts, litigation funders.
Satrix ran a forensic audit of the complete session transcripts behind an AI-assisted legal appeal: 46 production agents, 192 citations checked to the page, 18 defects caught before filing, and a catalog of 12 failure and recovery pairs. The process audit and the full case study are published alongside.