AI strategy, workflow development and verification for litigation teams. We work with counsel to decide where AI belongs, build around the case record, verify outputs against their sources, and document what was checked.
For an appeal or dispute already underway, we work to the matter's deadline. We build a document map, a sourced chronology and citation matrix, then stress-test the draft. Where facts need reconstructing, we write a forensic report: money flows, timelines and document trails traced, with each finding anchored to an exhibit.
Independent check of an AI-assisted filing or workflow: every citation to the page, every quotation to its source, a record of what was checked and what was not. Before filing, or after a show-cause order.
The same pipeline, built for one workflow you already do by hand. Four to six weeks, measured against a baseline. You keep the pipeline and the dossier.
An AI policy and verification protocol aligned with the rules that apply to your firm and the requirements of regulators and insurers. Training for the people responsible for reviewing and signing AI-assisted work.
For lawyers and legal teams, instructed by counsel of record. Which models see the material, and where it is stored, is agreed in writing; every step is logged; the lawyer decides and signs.
Post-deal and shareholder disputes, asset recovery and fraud, claims against professional advisers, regulatory and disciplinary proceedings, in English and Portuguese.
Three disciplines inform the work: high-reliability systems engineering, strategy consulting, and the deal side of M&A. Each shows up in practice: systems that keep state and log every step, options costed before counsel commits, and knowing where the evidence lives before disclosure arrives (the data room, the engagement letters, the board minutes). The fourth is litigation itself, as a party.
When a matter needs more than we are, we bring the specialist in, briefed from the case file: expert witnesses, forensic accountants, investigators, foreign-law experts, litigation funders.
Satrix ran a forensic audit of the complete session transcripts behind an AI-assisted legal appeal: 46 production agents, 192 citations checked to the page, 18 defects caught before filing, and a catalog of 12 failure and recovery pairs. The process audit and the full case study are published alongside.