Satrix.ai

Agentic AI for litigation, built around the matter and verified before filing.

Built on live matters where our founder was the party, not the adviser: criminal complaint, civil claim, professional disciplinary and data-protection proceedings, in three jurisdictions.

AI strategy, workflow development and verification for litigation teams. We work with counsel to decide where AI belongs, build around the case record, verify outputs against their sources, and document what was checked.

01

On a live matter

For an appeal or dispute already underway, we work to the matter's deadline. We build a document map, a sourced chronology and citation matrix, then stress-test the draft. Where facts need reconstructing, we write a forensic report: money flows, timelines and document trails traced, with each finding anchored to an exhibit.

02

Verification audit

Independent check of an AI-assisted filing or workflow: every citation to the page, every quotation to its source, a record of what was checked and what was not. Before filing, or after a show-cause order. Available to the firm filing it, and to the client who has to sign off on it.

03

Pilot build

The same pipeline, built for one workflow you already do by hand. Four to six weeks, measured against a baseline. You keep the pipeline and the dossier, and the baseline becomes your evidence to the client that the work is faster and accountable, which is the question clients now ask.

04

Governance and training

An AI policy and verification protocol aligned with the rules that apply to your firm and the requirements of regulators and insurers. Training for the people responsible for reviewing and signing AI-assisted work.

For counsel of record, and for the party instructing them. Firms bring us filings to verify. Parties and in-house teams bring us matters where the lawyer's involvement is still being scoped, or where they are running the matter themselves. Which models see the material, and where it is stored, is agreed in writing; every step is logged; the lawyer, or the party acting in person, decides and signs.

Where we fit

Commercial disputes, seen from the deal side

Post-deal and shareholder disputes, asset recovery and fraud, claims against professional advisers, regulatory and disciplinary proceedings, in English and Portuguese.

Three disciplines inform the work: high-reliability systems engineering, strategy consulting, and the deal side of M&A. Each shows up in practice: systems that keep state and log every step, options costed before counsel commits, and knowing where the evidence lives before disclosure arrives (the data room, the engagement letters, the board minutes).

When a matter needs more than we are, we bring the specialist in, briefed from the case file: expert witnesses, forensic accountants, investigators, foreign-law experts, litigation funders.

Read the audit →
Regulatory and market watch
See all →
Built by Satrix
Built to the rules that now apply
  • FloridaJun 2026Rule 2.515(d)(2), certification of cited authorities
  • New YorkJun 202622 NYCRR Part 161, no fabricated authority
  • England and WalesAug 2026SRA warning notice on the misuse of AI
  • SpainApr 2026CGAE Circular 3/2026, duty to verify AI output
  • PortugalApr 2026CSM recommendations on AI in judicial work